tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916332485223671615.post1000104252755941224..comments2023-09-30T08:53:15.486-07:00Comments on Shelly Lowenkopf's Blog: Fatal Attractionslowenkopfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05198658136254028258noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916332485223671615.post-66452951514504946362008-03-01T20:59:00.000-08:002008-03-01T20:59:00.000-08:00The world would be a better place if the word "per...The world would be a better place if the word "perfervid" were used more often.<BR/><BR/>And I think that if George W. Bush had a broken-down old horse whom he believed to be beautiful,he'd be much more likable.<BR/><BR/>Oh, wait. There's Dick Cheney, isn't there?<BR/><BR/>Well, never mind.David Rochesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07084315223515340046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916332485223671615.post-77809930737907246652008-03-01T01:52:00.000-08:002008-03-01T01:52:00.000-08:0018. I reckon they were just in it for larfs.18. I reckon they were just in it for larfs.lettucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13872380339261609060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916332485223671615.post-51615763028329507042008-02-29T15:23:00.000-08:002008-02-29T15:23:00.000-08:00This is a psych test isn't it? You're really an ag...This is a psych test isn't it? You're really an agent with the NSA trying to profile crazy bloggers aren't you? :oP<BR/><BR/>On 4, yes, yes, and... what was the question again? Oh right, is there a pattern. I suppose Hillary and Bill might fit the profile. Maybe they take turns though.<BR/><BR/>5) Oh right. Co-dependence. Yes, but there usually is between a protagonist and their nemesis. You know, this being drawn from my experience with the bastard children of the literary world, also known as comic books.<BR/><BR/>5a) Yes<BR/>5b) More than likely.<BR/><BR/>6)Yes and so do the rest of us.<BR/><BR/>7) Is this a trick question?<BR/><BR/>8) None at all, because we would be chased around the globe by an ever advancing wave, and the moon always overhead. (That sounds like a bad Science Fiction Movie actually.)<BR/><BR/>9) Only because they were sold a lousy piece of real estate. I feel for them.<BR/><BR/>10) O.k. I have to admit ignorance here, as I've not read Moby Dick, nor have I yet seen "No Country For Old Men". (Which I'm assuming is not just a movie but is probably also a book.) So, I'll get back to you on that one, when I've taken the pains to read about Cpt. Ahab, and eventually to read the other classics I've apparently missed involving John Quartermain, Dorian Grey, Cpt. Nemo, and Dr. Jekyll.<BR/><BR/>11) I would like to slap my large tail against their boat and smash it smitherines.<BR/><BR/>11a) That would depend on the intent of those in the boat. Given the context, probably yes.<BR/><BR/>12) Indeed.<BR/><BR/>13) I do remember from a plethora of pop culture references to the classic piece.<BR/><BR/>14) Ah yes, as the moth drawn to a flame. Or is that too cliche?<BR/><BR/>15) No, but perhaps the embodiment of what occurs when past history is ignored instead of learned from.<BR/><BR/>16) More.<BR/><BR/>16a) Because the only thing Don Quixote attacked was windmills, and at least he did that with some semblance of skill. Bush attacks nations and does so with apparent ineptness.<BR/><BR/>17) Because one can't hibernate quite that long and live to tell about it.<BR/><BR/>18) *Sigh* You have to hit one of the few Shakespearian plays that I have yet to read. I give up. What was it that they wanted?Square1https://www.blogger.com/profile/13559171378908608414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7916332485223671615.post-14699429101767802392008-02-29T12:45:00.000-08:002008-02-29T12:45:00.000-08:00Boy. Full buffet, monsieur Lowenkopf. Let's see:3 ...Boy. Full buffet, monsieur Lowenkopf. Let's see:<BR/><BR/>3 and 5b - for sure.<BR/><BR/>I say 1 and 5<BR/>and 2 and 5a) let's face it they'd be bored silly without the chasing around, no?<BR/><BR/>6. yep. and vice-versa.<BR/><BR/>7. Hate to say this but word would be out on the street it that were the case.<BR/><BR/>8. none whatsoever.<BR/><BR/>9. aka as The Origins of the Sub-prime Market Crash <BR/><BR/>10. Wile E metaphysics here (no, I did not misspell woolly)<BR/><BR/>11. I'd start off crotchety and end up evil (probably in caps)<BR/><BR/>11a) that's the way the whales tell it to the kiddies anyway.<BR/><BR/>12. It is a well-known fact that I stay out of political debates as a matter of principle.<BR/><BR/>13. yes, this is very true; as a practitioner of perfervidness (perfervidity?), I can attest to it.<BR/><BR/>14. "the solenoid of Fate". oy. (Does it hurt?)<BR/><BR/>15. Only when they sing "che sera sera" together on a lost tape from the Ed Sullivan Show<BR/><BR/>16. Much much less. Unfortunately.<BR/>16a) for this very reason.<BR/><BR/>17. Hate to tell you but most people have fallen asleep. It's just us insomniacs ranting about it.<BR/><BR/>18. OK. You asked for it. "Thrice to thrice, and thrice to mine/And thrice again, to make up nine" (I, iii, ll.35-36). In other words? They were really the nine Muses in clever disguise. <BR/><BR/>Phew. Think I'll go read a bit of Krishnamurti to relax a bit.R.L. Bourgeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02850533057828782722noreply@blogger.com