Today, when you were least feeling like it, thanks to a raging sinus headache, a client was badgering you for the truth and you were thinking this was not a good time for you to give such answers, rather this was a time to tell the client you wanted to direct attention to some anomalies.
"This is not profitable," you said. "There is profit in addressing the need for your characters to sound considerably less like each other and more individual." At which point you were confronted with, "So, you're saying I write lousy dialogue?"
"I'm saying you can enhance your dialogue by making it reflect what the speaker wants>"
"All right, so tell me, who do you think writes powerful dialogue?"
"This is off topic," you say. "You are a client. If we were in a more formal editor writer situation, we'd be having this conversation because I had some thought that the work could do well among readers."
"You're all alike, you guys. No consideration for the writer."
"Actually, we are not alike. Editors differ in their opinions as much as readers do in theirs."
"Fucking Gordon Lish, you think you are," the client says.
"Actually, I wrote a review of one of his collections of short stories and my conclusion was that the Emperor had no clothes."
"All alike, every last one of you."
"The funny thing," you said, " is that not all writers are alike--except the ones who tell you,'Go ahead. Give me some honest feedback. I can take it."
We could conceivably remained standing there for some time, exchanging barrages of "All alike." but as you noted, your headache was something not even the coffee was helping, so you got the hell out of there.
Not even my responses to criticism are all alike. Go ahead and be frank, I probably can't take it, but I'll do what I can.
ReplyDeleteFeel better.