Your notes,
your memory banks, and even these vagrant blog essays are brim-full of events
where you have learned on an intellectual level some painful awareness of a
level you’d call accurate and universal.
Problem is, in
many such cases, you have not taken into consideration the other side of the
equals sign, the emotional side of learning.
This awareness is vital in life and in fiction to the point where either
way, in life or in fiction, a character who has learned a thing only one way is
vulnerable to story.
The behavior of
such an individual, in real life or story, is recognizable and on the way to
the reversals, destabilizing events, and realizations a person accrues in real
life and is hit in the face with in dramatic narrative.
The most recent
cause to be aware of this syndrome is your awareness on an intellectual level
that discussions of religious or political conviction that devolve into screed
and ad hominem argument are not conversation, are not argument in the Socratic
dialogue sense or any other rational progression. Further, the longer you remain in the
exchange, in direct proportion, the less the likelihood either you or your
opponent will learn anything or be able to move on to more civil discourse in
other areas. Further still, the longer
it will take you to work off your cholers.
On two separate occasions today, you encountered such
behavior. You are only now able to sort
them and move in, but in each case—and this is your point—you do so grudgingly,
with a grumble. Grudgingly and grumble
are not words of positive enthusiasm.
Occasion one was about publishing, a former client, and
behavior not well suited in your opinion to help the client advance in any
positive way toward a desired publishing career. In fact, the client proceeded against advice
to self-publishing and to have paid a review source a considerable sum for a
review that was at best tepid.
Occasion two was pure political head butting, with you a
witness against your better judgment, with the no tangible result except, here
you go again, a grudging and grumbling retreat.
You are not one for spectator sports, yet you were more or less
leveraged into attending a contest in a sport for which you have no taste, with
no stake in any kind of positive outcome, and with the dreaded residue of
grudging and grumbling.
You are also aware how those two descriptors, grumbling and
grudging, when manifest in a character, tend to move that character away from
the front line of a story, which is at least a small victory in the dramatic
sense. In the real life sense, grudging
and grumbling move individuals from the front line of their own story, their
life story, which may, should the individual chose, be creative as opposed to
being reactive.
There are a great many things in life and story to which one
may be reactive, but you do not see this as being creative in ways that bring
you any pleasure, either of the senses or of learning.
Your great hope for the events alluded here, for they were
with some deliberation not detailed, is that when you come to review these
paragraphs, you will no longer recall the events or individuals in either one. Or, if you do remember them, the details will
have settled, you will no longer be grudging or grumbling; the matter will have
become muscle memory.
No comments:
Post a Comment