Irony is about intended and unintentional opposites. You say one thing, particularly if you add
emphasis to it, what you’re really saying is the opposite. Were you to begin an essay with the
declaration, This is not about death and dying, the essay in all probability is
about death and dying. You strive for
emphasis by saying, This is not about death and dying, this is about life and
living, and the reader is going to have increased certainty that the piece is
about what it claims not to be.
Somewhere, an editor will say, Why don’t you get rid of the
disclaimer, maybe tell us what the essay is going to be about?
Works the other way as well:
You come out with a positive, affirmative tone. This is about life and living. If so, do we have to be told?
Is it in fact possible to speak of one without the other
causing an elephant-sized bump under the living room rug?
In today’s mail, there was an invitation-sized envelope,
which grabbed your attention because you have come to associate such envelopes
with notes from the editors of journals, speaking of their pleasure in
accepting a short story or essay of yours for publication.
This association was enhanced by the memory that you in fact
have a short story in submission. The
heading of the stationery dispelled your pleasant, life and living associations
with shattering immediacy. The Neptune
Society was congratulating you. At
least, the tone of the enclosed note seemed congratulatory. You were, after all, being awarded
something. All you needed do was call
the enclosed number to accept the award and make necessary arrangements.
The award was for a free cremation, which is, in fact, your
hoped for fate although, as you see things, this will not be something that
will matter to you because you will when the time arrives for such choices, be
beyond them. The Neptune Society is, in
fact, an advocate of cremation, emphasizing the need for you to make the choice
and subsequent arrangements while you are still in a position to do so.
The unspoken is an acknowledgment you both make. The reason this is at all relevant is because
it is a similar acknowledgment made by an author you much admire, whose work, As I Lay Dying, you will be presenting
in a literature class in a matter of a few weeks.
The title comes from a remark Agamemnon makes to Odysseus in
The Odyssey, on the occasion of the
latter’s visit to the Underworld to consult with the former. The writers who were Homer and, indeed, the
thinking classes of Greeks, Turks, Macedonians, and the like evolved a scenario
for death where the living could contact them and, presumably, the dead had
limited abilities to express themselves.
To your knowledge, no one has commented on the likelihood of the
contacts being relative to exchanging nor mere information but story, perhaps
even ironic story.
For his part, Faulkner is having a character appear on her
deathbed, aware of her forthcoming death, in fact watching her own coffin being
built. She was a teacher and may have,
as her creator had, been familiar with Homer, although this is not likely. She is, however, in some ways like Odysseus,
essentially a control freak. She wants her body transported back to Jefferson,
the area of her kinfolk. Most of the
action of the book involves the transportation of her in that coffin.
The invitation to accept a free cremation from the Neptune
Society was not the immediate trigger to your momentary speculations about the
process of life and the ending of that process, nor of the relationship between
the two so far as you and fellow humans are concerned. It was the Faulkner and its implications of
what each means in the face and absence of confrontation of the other.
It was you, looking at the award the way you’ve looked from
time to time at flies and mosquitoes. Their
presence is a reality, also a bother.
There are things you hope to essay before the process you have been at
such pains to build up is extended to its and you limits, where it is the
ongoing statement of all you were instead of you being present to taunt it with
potential.
Last week, when you met your youngest niece for lunch, she
gave you about twenty of your earlier novels, written in your late twenties and
early thirties. This was about two days
after you’d in a semi-dream-semi-awake state, seen and composed an opening
chapter to a novel you’re eager to get at after you complete the nonfiction
project under way.
Looking at these early novels reminded you of Odysseus going
to the Underworld to consult with Agamemnon. You see so much beyond what you
saw then, irony, awards, essential opposites, squeezed into close,
uncomfortable quarters.
No comments:
Post a Comment