In the not to distant past, when you were making
simultaneous marks in the worlds of writing and publishing, you had frequent
association with a craft where perfection was a given.
That craft was typesetting.
At the time, you were used to seeing long strips of foolscap
paper representing the typeset materials before they were arranged in page
format.
If you saw an apparent mistake, such as the word
“manuscript” rendered as “manuscurt,” your next step was to check the
manuscript. If the manuscript indeed
said “manuscript,” you made the appropriate proofreader’s symbol around
“manuscurt” and next to it, the initials PE, for printer’s error. The compositor by tradition corrected the
error without charging the publisher.
Even during the next shift from the so-called “hot metal” of
the Mergenthaler linotype to photocomposition, compositors stood by their
standard of complete accuracy. If a
project got into type with errors, whether the errors were PEs or the
publisher’s, the publisher took the hit for missing the typographical error.
You were reminded of such nostalgia as you read through the
final set of proofs for your latest project, mindful that these pages are no
longer called proofs, rather they are ARCs, advanced reading copies, sent forth
to review sources and blurb sources, with a band across the cover that reads
“Advance Reading Copies.” On the back
cover, there is a bold notice: “This is an uncorrected proof.”
Yours is pretty well corrected, although you did find
manuscript misspelled, and you did see in a longish reference you’d made to
William Faulkner’s novel. As I Lay Dying,
a character named Jewel Bundren referred to as “her.” Nope.
Jewel is indeed a man, the favorite son of the character about whom the
novel takes its title.
In an earlier set of proofing, you discovered in the text
the statement that Captain Ahab was the only survivor of Moby Dick.
The standard courtesy is for the author, particularly in a
work of non-fiction, to take responsibility for all the errors. You have no problem with this even though you’re
pretty grounded with the knowledge of how the word manuscript is spelled, who
the only survivor is of Moby Dick, and
the actual gender of Jewel Bundren.
In publishing process as in life, there are ample
opportunities for mistakes. Some of
these opportunities transcend mere knowledge of information or, indeed, of
spelling. Although you can often catch some of your mistakes, there is no
certainty that you will catch all of them, a lack of certainty that bridges the
worlds of reality and writing.
Some of these mistakes originate with you, either from
inadvertent decisions or complete ignorance.
The very individuals whose job is to support the accuracy of the project
may introduce other mistakes.
Mistakes sprout up about you like unwanted hairs growing in
places you’d not thought programmed to grow hairs under any circumstances. You
make enough mistakes not to be overly disturbed by their frequency or to cause
you to hesitate before making most decisions, your operating philosophy being
that a morbid fear of mistakes will in the long term produce more mistakes than
not.
You tend to get beyond bad situational mistakes the way you
get beyond the number of games of chess you have lost, the sheer number of
those losing games being enough to steer you away from chess encounters and
toward situations and events where you have a greater chance of success.
There are relationships you’ve had that were mistakes from
the beginning, but since you ventured into these with good, open faith, you are
not so concerned about relationships as you are about chess.
You’ve made mistakes with written things, leaving too soon,
staying too long, taking the wrong point of vantage, underestimating or
overestimating the theme or importance or how you felt or how you allowed fear
and impatience to influence your departure or diagnosis.
Writing and life and mistakes all go together, a kind of
existential fraction where risk is the denominator. Neither life nor writing without risk of
mistake can amount to much of interest.
This is perhaps the main reason why there are so many things you didn’t
finish—you didn’t see the risks to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment